The Democrats sound an amazing deal just like the Egyptian regime of Gen. Abdel el-Sisi. The best way Democrats justify this to themselves is important to consider. Not even probably the most despotic tyrants like to consider themselves in that way. All tyrants concoct theories and excuses to justify their censorship as noble and obligatory. The identical Democratic House Committee that's demanding higher online censorship from social media firms now has its sights set on the removal of conservative cable shops, including Fox News, from the airwaves. They don't seem to be merely advocating alternative ideologies however are destabilizing society with lies, pretend information, and speech that intentionally incites violence, subversion and home terrorism. Unless you consider in the best of the federal government to regulate and management what the press says - a energy which the primary Amendment explicitly prohibits - how can anyone be snug with members of Congress arrogating unto themselves the ability to dictate what media retailers are permitted to report and control how they discuss and analyze the news of the day? Do any of the people who spent 4 years pretending to care so deeply in regards to the very important role of press freedom have something to say about this full frontal attack by the majority occasion in Washington on news outlets opposed to their political agenda and ideology?
MSNBC and CNN spent four years endorsing the most deranged conspiracy principle imaginable, one with very toxic roots within the Cold War: namely, the McCarthyite script that the Kremlin had taken over control of key U.S. Just think about if, in the course of the Trump years, the GOP Senate had abused its power to bully cable retailers into eradicating MSNBC from their platforms, or banning liberal journalists and activists from utilizing social media platforms, on the grounds that they had been spreading conspiracy theories and fake information. "We're not requesting any press censorship," they assured the FCC beneath Trump. They don't, in fact, explicitly acknowledge that they are engaged in authoritarian assaults on free speech and a free press. It ought to, since that's precisely what House Democrats are saying to ennoble their multi-pronged assault on free expression. But what House Democrats are doing here is far more insidious than what is revealed by that creepy official announcement.
Indeed, the justifying script Democrats are using here is the one most commonly employed by autocrats around the globe to silence their critics. The letter sent by two senior Democrats on the House Energy and Commerce Committee to cable corporations and other regulated entities, and the Committee’s own hearing this week on "disinformation in the media," are the most recent examples. Revealingly, these same two members of Congress who sent this threatening letter to cable suppliers stated throughout the Trump years that freedom of the press should be safeguarded at all prices. But corporate media outlets and Democrats (excuse the redundancy) who spent the last 4 years posturing as virulent defenders of press freedoms by no means meant it. Just two weeks in the past, Sisi’s regime finally launched an Al Jazeera journalist who had been imprisoned for 4 years based on accusations that he had "spread false news" and was responsible of "incitement in opposition to state institutions and broadcasting false news with the aim of spreading chaos." Sound familiar? "The First Amendment prohibits Congress from making laws that abridge the freedom of the press, and we cherish our country's culture of free expression," they intoned when writing to the FCC in 2019 to complain that Russian news retailers have been concealing their affiliation with the Kremlin.
The Committee to protect Journalists in 2013 mentioned they had "tracked a major rise in journalist imprisonments." The offender, mentioned the group, was "the enlargement of anti-terrorism and national security laws worldwide" after the 9/eleven attack, which had been repeatedly abused to criminalize media shops. When the Obama administration collaborated with the UK Government in 2013 to detain my husband David Miranda at Heathrow Airport in reference to the work he was doing within the Snowden reporting, they cited an anti-terrorism legislation to justify his detention, and repeatedly threatened to prosecute him for terrorism if he did not cooperate by providing all of his passwords to them. No authorities official has any business inquiring about the ‘moral principles’ that guide a private entity’s decision about what news to hold. Jerry McNerney (D-CA) also despatched their very own letters to seven of the nation’s largest cable providers - Comcast, AT&T, Spectrum, Dish, Verizon, Cox and Altice - as well as to digital distributors of cable information (Roku, Amazon, Apple, Google and Hulu) demanding to know, amongst different issues, what these cable distributors did to stop conservative "disinformation" previous to the election and after - disinformation, they stated, that just so happened to be unfold by the one conservative cable retailers: Fox, Newsmax and OANN.
Congratulations! Your What Is Control Cable Is (Are) About To Stop Being Relevant
by Bryan Showers (2025-02-08)
The Democrats sound an amazing deal just like the Egyptian regime of Gen. Abdel el-Sisi. The best way Democrats justify this to themselves is important to consider. Not even probably the most despotic tyrants like to consider themselves in that way. All tyrants concoct theories and excuses to justify their censorship as noble and obligatory. The identical Democratic House Committee that's demanding higher online censorship from social media firms now has its sights set on the removal of conservative cable shops, including Fox News, from the airwaves. They don't seem to be merely advocating alternative ideologies however are destabilizing society with lies, pretend information, and speech that intentionally incites violence, subversion and home terrorism. Unless you consider in the best of the federal government to regulate and management what the press says - a energy which the primary Amendment explicitly prohibits - how can anyone be snug with members of Congress arrogating unto themselves the ability to dictate what media retailers are permitted to report and control how they discuss and analyze the news of the day? Do any of the people who spent 4 years pretending to care so deeply in regards to the very important role of press freedom have something to say about this full frontal attack by the majority occasion in Washington on news outlets opposed to their political agenda and ideology?
MSNBC and CNN spent four years endorsing the most deranged conspiracy principle imaginable, one with very toxic roots within the Cold War: namely, the McCarthyite script that the Kremlin had taken over control of key U.S. Just think about if, in the course of the Trump years, the GOP Senate had abused its power to bully cable retailers into eradicating MSNBC from their platforms, or banning liberal journalists and activists from utilizing social media platforms, on the grounds that they had been spreading conspiracy theories and fake information. "We're not requesting any press censorship," they assured the FCC beneath Trump. They don't, in fact, explicitly acknowledge that they are engaged in authoritarian assaults on free speech and a free press. It ought to, since that's precisely what House Democrats are saying to ennoble their multi-pronged assault on free expression. But what House Democrats are doing here is far more insidious than what is revealed by that creepy official announcement.
Indeed, the justifying script Democrats are using here is the one most commonly employed by autocrats around the globe to silence their critics. The letter sent by two senior Democrats on the House Energy and Commerce Committee to cable corporations and other regulated entities, and the Committee’s own hearing this week on "disinformation in the media," are the most recent examples. Revealingly, these same two members of Congress who sent this threatening letter to cable suppliers stated throughout the Trump years that freedom of the press should be safeguarded at all prices. But corporate media outlets and Democrats (excuse the redundancy) who spent the last 4 years posturing as virulent defenders of press freedoms by no means meant it. Just two weeks in the past, Sisi’s regime finally launched an Al Jazeera journalist who had been imprisoned for 4 years based on accusations that he had "spread false news" and was responsible of "incitement in opposition to state institutions and broadcasting false news with the aim of spreading chaos." Sound familiar? "The First Amendment prohibits Congress from making laws that abridge the freedom of the press, and we cherish our country's culture of free expression," they intoned when writing to the FCC in 2019 to complain that Russian news retailers have been concealing their affiliation with the Kremlin.
The Committee to protect Journalists in 2013 mentioned they had "tracked a major rise in journalist imprisonments." The offender, mentioned the group, was "the enlargement of anti-terrorism and national security laws worldwide" after the 9/eleven attack, which had been repeatedly abused to criminalize media shops. When the Obama administration collaborated with the UK Government in 2013 to detain my husband David Miranda at Heathrow Airport in reference to the work he was doing within the Snowden reporting, they cited an anti-terrorism legislation to justify his detention, and repeatedly threatened to prosecute him for terrorism if he did not cooperate by providing all of his passwords to them. No authorities official has any business inquiring about the ‘moral principles’ that guide a private entity’s decision about what news to hold. Jerry McNerney (D-CA) also despatched their very own letters to seven of the nation’s largest cable providers - Comcast, AT&T, Spectrum, Dish, Verizon, Cox and Altice - as well as to digital distributors of cable information (Roku, Amazon, Apple, Google and Hulu) demanding to know, amongst different issues, what these cable distributors did to stop conservative "disinformation" previous to the election and after - disinformation, they stated, that just so happened to be unfold by the one conservative cable retailers: Fox, Newsmax and OANN.
For more information on what is control cable stop by the site.