Good Governance and Banking Ombudsman in India
Abstract
A systematic institutional set up for ensuring the accountability and fairness in the functioning of the state and its institutions is prerequisite for the good governance. Banking sector is a service oriented sector. It needs a well designed mechanism of Redressal to the grievances of the stakeholders to ensure the better service to the people and in turn to fetch the confidence and satisfaction of the people. In view of providing a systematic and well organized system of Redressal mechanism to the customers, the Reserve Bank of India notified BOS (Banking Ombudsman Scheme) on June 14, 1995 as per the provision of Section 35A of the Banking Regulation act, 1949. Good Governance is basically concerned with accountability, transparency, reliability, predictability, openness, efficiency and effectiveness of the system. Accountability is the major concern in the organization/institution. Accountability gives responsibility to the individuals and institutions for their decisions and actions to ensure the objectivity. The issues related to accountability verily could be seen in all sectors wherever the public delivery is concerned. In the existing system policy formulation and monitoring of its implementation is being performed by the same institution/organization which leaves the objectivity under question. In order to ensure the better functioning of the public delivery system it is aptly required that both the functions should not be performed by the same institutions/ organizations. Monitoring of implementation of the policies should necessarily be given to the unbiased and different institution. The present argument gives strength to the ombudsman institution which works as watchdog being an external institution. The study looks at to explore the role of the Banking Ombudsman as a promoter of good governance in Indian banking sector. In order to answer the question, the theory of Good Governance and its integral principle, Accountability are taken into account. The Banking Ombudsman in India acts as an external organization which allows customers of bank to give complaints against the deficiencies. However, the efficiency and effectiveness of the Banking Ombudsman depends on different variables such independence of the institution, defined jurisdiction, accessibility of the institution to the public, and its efficiency in its work. These all factors are taken into account in this study.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Hong SP. A Comparative study on ombudsman institutions in Asian Region. Korea: Anti-Corruption and Civil Rights Commission, Korea. 2011. p. 5.
Ibid, p. 5.
Kucsko-Stadlmayer G. European OmbudsmanInstitutions: A comparative legal analysis regarding the multifaceted realization of an idea. Springer Wien New York, Austria. 2008. p. 1.
The Department of Administrative Reforms and Public Grievances. 2015. Why Regulatory Institutions. Retrieved from Portal for Public Grievances: http:// pgportal.gov.in/grm.aspx.
Reif LC. The Ombudsman, Good Governance and the International Human Rights System. Springer Science + Business Media, BV, Leiden. 2004. p. 2.
The Reserve Bank of India. Annual Report on Banking Ombudsman Scheme, 2013-14. Mumbai: Reserve Bank of India. Retrieved March 27, 2015. Available from: http://www.rbi.org.in/Scripts/PublicationsView. aspx?id=16204.
The Reserve Bank of India. (2013). Annual Report on Banking Ombudsman Scheme, 2011-12. Mumbai: Reserve Bank of India. Retrieved August 25, 2015. Available from: http://www.rbi.org.in/Scripts/ PublicationsView.aspx?id=14759#5.
Meduri A. Is consumer court really preferred to banking ombudsman? An Analytical Study. 2014. Retrieved from works.bepress.com: http://law.bepress.com/ cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=9010&context=expresso.
Saraiya RG. Commission was set up by the government of India on 29 January 1969 and submitted their report on 9 February 1972.
Expert group on state enactments having a bearing on commercial bank lending to agriculture constituted under the chairmanship of Talwar RK. 1969.
Working Group on Accounting Procedure and Maintenance of Records at Bank Branches set up under the chairmanship of Goiporia MN, chairman, Dena Bank. 1981.
Lalat K, Pani SS. Banking and bank ombudsman; requirement, changes, complaint analysis and the way forward. The International Journal of Management 2013; 2(3): 19-27.
Pacha Malyadri SS. Success of banking ombudsmen scheme: Myth or reality. International Journal of Research Studies in Management 2012; 1(Number 1): 17-24.
The Committee headed by Narasimham, submitted a summary Report to the Government of India on November 8, 1991 and the Main Report on November 16, 1991.
Singh T. Redressal of customer’s grievances in banks: a study of bank Ombudsman’s performance in India. International Journal of Reserach in Commerce and
Management 20122; 2(6): 84-90.
Khan S. Critical analysis of banking ombudsman scheme. 2014. Retrieved from Jurisonline: http:// www.jurisonline.in/article-description/n-a/criticalanalysis-of-banking-ombudsman-scheme/470.
The Reserve Bank of India. Banking Ombudsman Scheme 2006. Reserve Bank of India, Mumbai. Retrieved October 26, 2014.
Clause 9 of the Banking Ombudsman Scheme, 2006
Suspension of the Scheme. ‘Award’ means any direction passed by the Banking Ombudsman in accordance with the Scheme. Available from: https://www.rbi.org.in/ scriptS/PublicationsView.aspx?id=4368.
Clause 14 of the Banking Ombudsman Scheme, 2006.
UN General Assembly Resolution 63/169, 2008, on the role of the Ombudsman, mediator and other national human rights institutions and protection of human rights, preamble; UN General Assembly Resolution 65/207, 2010, on the role of the Ombudsman, mediator and other national human rights institutions in the promotion and protection of human rights, preamble.
Frahm M. Australasia and pacific ombudsman institutions; mandates, competences and good practice. Springer, New York. 2013: 51-52.
Good Governance: Meaning and Concept. Available from: https://academy.gktoday.in/article/goodgovernance-meaning-and-concept/.
Woods N. Making the IMF and world bank more accountable. International Affairs 2001; 77(1): 83-100.
Stiglizt J. Democratizing the international monetary fund and the world bank. Governance 2003; 16(1): 111-39.
Džanić S. Ombudsman as promotor of Good Governance. Erasmus University, Rotterdam, Erasmus. 2006.
Pillay N. Current challenges to the protection and promotion of human rights. In: IOI world conference in Stockholm.
Frahm M. Australasia and Pacific Ombudsman Institutions; Mandates, Competences and Good Practice. Springer, New York. 2013. p.13.
Reif LC. The Ombudsman, Good Governance and the International Human Rights System. Springer Science + Business Media, BV, Leiden. 2004. p. 48.
Olowu. Good Governance and Development Challenges: in the South Pacific: The Promise of Ombudsmanship. In: Rief LC. The International Ombudsman Yearbook, Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, Leiden / Boston. 2007. pp. 91-121.
Reif LC. The Ombudsman, Good Governance and the International Human Rights System. Springer Science + Business Media, BV, Leiden. 2004. p. 396.
Fowlie F. A Practitioner’s Guide to Evaluating Ombudsman. Retrieved February 20, 2017. 2007. Available from: Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers: http://www.icann.org/ ombudsman/guide-evaluateombudsman-offices.pdf.
The Reserve Bank of India. Annual Report on Banking Ombudsman Scheme, 2015-16. Mumbai: Reserve Bank of India. Retrieved on March 25, 2017. 2013. Available from: http://www.rbi.org.in/Scripts/PublicationsView. aspx?id=14759#5.
Reserve Bank of India. Branch Banking Statistics. Department of Statistics and Information Management.
Reserve Bank of India, Mumbai. 2009. p. 4.
Reserve Bank of India. Branch Banking Statistics. Department of Statistics and Information Management. Reserve Bank of India, Mumbai. 2009. p. 4.
Reserve Bank of India. Branch Banking Statistics. Department of Statistics and Information Management. Reserve Bank of India, Mumbai. 2009. p. 4.
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.