Optimization of Coconut Butter prepared by incorporating Peanut Butter and Dairy Butter

P Rajalakshmy

Abstract


The coconut butter was formulated by incorporating the peanut butter and dairy butter to bring out the acceptable consistency and studied is about the physicochemical, sensory parameters of the developed product. Three different ratio of coconut butter: Peanut butter: Dairy butter (3:1:1, 2:1:0.5, 1:1:0.3) were optimized. The optimized butter was stabilized by adding hydrogenated palm oil, gelatin, and guar gum in 1, 1.5, 2 ratios, respectively for controlling the oil migration from the developed butter. Two sweetener were used in the mixed butter namely sugar and the combination of sugar honey in two different ratio whereas 9% and 13%, and salt was used two different ratio that is 0.9% and 1.1%. The suitable kind of sweetener, stabilizer and the level of sweetener, salt, stabilizer and ratio of mixed butter were identified using sensory evaluation (9 point hedonic scale) to yield a mixed butter which resembles as a commercial peanut butter, the self life is estimated both in room temperature (25C) and refrigerator temperature (4C) through peroxide value and free fatty acid value by the level of rancidity of the mixed butter. 


Keywords


Coconut butter, Optimization, Stabilizer, Mixed Butter.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Bach AC, Babayan VK. Medium-chain triglyceridesan update America. Journal of Clinical Nutrition 1982; 36: 950-62. 2. Basha SM, Pancholy SK. Composition and characteristics of basic proteins from peanut (Arachishypogaea L.). Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 1982; 30: 1176-79. 3. Desai BB, Kotecha PM, Salunkhe DK. Science and technology of groundnut: biology, production, processing and utilization. Naya Prokash, Calcutta, 1999: 677. 4. Dulloo AG, Fathi M, Mensi N et al. Twenty-four hour energy expenditure and urinary catecholamines of humans consuming low-to-moderate amounts of Medium-Chain Triglycerides: A dose-response study in a human respiratory chamber. European Journal of Clinical Nutrition 1996; 50: 152-15. 5. Land DG, Shepherd R. Scaling and ranking methods. In: Piggott JR (Ed.). Sensory Analysis of Foods. Elsevier Applied Science Publishers, London, 1984: 141-77. 6. Meilgaard M, Civille GV, Carr BT. Sensory evaluation techniques. 3rd Edn. New York: CRC Press, 1999.

Rajalakshmy P

Mulder H, Walstra P. The milk fat globules Wageningen Netherlands. Center for agricultural publishing and documentation, 1974. 8. Patterson G, Perez P. Solar drying in the tropics. Santa Monica, USA: Meals for Millions of freedom from hunger foundation, 1981: 13. 9. Prinyawiwatkul W, Beuchat LR, McWatters KH. Functional property changes in partially defatted peanut flour caused by fungal fermentation and heat treatment. Journal of Food Science 1993; 58: 1318-23. 10. Riccardi G, Giacco R, Rivellese AA. Dietary fat, insulin sensitivity and the metabolic syndrome. Clinical Nutrition 2004; 23: 447-56. 11. Speer E. Milk and Dairy Product Technology. New York NY nt, USA: Marcel Dekker Inc., 1995.

Stein DT, Stevenson BE, Chester MW et al. The Insulin tropic potency of fatty acids is influenced profoundly by their chain length and degree of saturation. Journal of Clinical Investigation 1997; 100: 398-403. 13. Tate PV, Chavan JK, Patil PB et al. Processing of commercial peanut cake into food-grade meal and its utilization in preparation of cookies. Plant Foods and Human Nutrition 1990; 40: 115-21. 14. USDA-NAL. United States Department of Agricultural-National Agricultural Library, 2005. 15. Washington DC. AOAC: Association of Official Analytical Chemists Official Methods of Analysis. 13th Edn. 1981: 1017-23. 16. Woodroof JG. Peanuts: Production, processing, products. Westport, Connecticut: Avi Publishing Co., 1983.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.